Many investors sense that the stock market, after the stupendous run of the past five years, is overextended and vulnerable. Yet even folks who shudder at the market's high-wire act often find it difficult to sell—particularly in a taxable account.
Not only are you forced to share up to 23.8% of your profits with Uncle Sam, but you also have to figure out when to get back in. If your favorite stocks don't backtrack far enough to cover your tax bill, you're worse off than if you had done nothing.
There's a convenient way out of this dilemma.
Don't sell what you own. Instead, hedge. Let me show you how.
The classic hedge is to sell stocks short. In a short sale, you borrow shares from your broker and sell them. You hope to buy the shares back ("cover the short") after the stock has dropped far enough to give you a profit, net of transaction costs.
For tax reasons, it's generally best not to short stocks you already own. Instead, I recommend choosing other stocks—preferably within the same or an allied industry—that possess weaker fundamentals than the name you wish to hedge.
Say, for example, you own a great industrial outfit like Dover Corp. (NYSE: DOV), a member of our model portfolio. I don't recommend shorting, or even selling, DOV—the company is simply doing too well.
Instead, you might hedge your position in DOV by shorting a shaky industrial like Alcoa (NYSE: AA). Alcoa bled $2.3 billion of losses in 2013 due to one-time items, and even on an operating basis, I expect the aluminum producer to log barely improved results this year.
In this month's issue of Profitable Investing, I list out which stocks to short specifically related to our model portfolio holdings. But you can take this same principle and apply it to weaker competitors of companies you own.
When you sell short, your potential profit is capped at 100%. (No stock can decline below zero.) However, there's no theoretical limit to your losses if the stock continues to rise. To remedy this problem, Wall Street's wizards have created short-selling funds. A number of these "inverse" funds now trade actively on the NYSE, giving you an opportunity to enter—or exit—a hedging position at any time during the business day.
Typically, an inverse ETF is designed to mirror either a broad market index or a market sector. If the underlying index falls 1% on a certain day, the inverse fund will climb approximately 1%. Vice versa if the index goes up. The ProShares organization has also launched a series of leveraged inverse funds, engineered to rise (or fall) twice or even three times as much as their underlying indexes in a single day.
Why do I keep referring to "one day"? Because inverse funds gradually lose their punch over time. Operating expenses and hedging costs weigh on a fund's longer-term performance. Thus, in 2011, when the S&P 500 index returned 2.1% (with dividends), ProShares Short S&P 500 ETF (NYSE: SH) lost 7.9% at net asset value—not the 2% or so that a casual investor might have expected.
Inverse funds, therefore, are best suited for in-and-out trading. Hold them several weeks or, at most, two to three months—during periods, in other words, when you're most concerned about the possibility of a market setback.
As long as you maintain a trader's mindset, these funds can add a valuable tool to your hedging kit. Unlike direct short selling, an inverse fund strictly limits your risk: The fund's net asset value can never go below zero. Stop-loss orders, prudently placed, can further curb your downside exposure.
Following is a list of inverse funds to consider purchasing when and if the S&P 500 reaches the 1900 resistance level I've marked out in recent issues of Profitable Investing. For each fund, I've indicated how to use it as a hedge—either for a piece of your equity portfolio, or for your entire basket of stockholdings.
Yours for Profitable Investing,
Richard E. Band
Richard E. Band is the newsletter world's #1 authority on investing for low-risk growth. His flagship Total Return Portfolio has grown sixfold since its inception in 1990, while taking far less risk than the popular stock market index funds. More »
My biggest success was discovering Richard's newsletter back in 1991. Being interested in science and engineering and not finance, I realized I needed someone who was knowledgeable and could be trusted for unbiased advice. I followed his advice for about a year before I invested any money, and became convinced his approach made sense for the long haul. I have been able to provide a comfortable retirement for myself and a significant portion of that has been due to Richard's advice.