Talk about a slow-motion picture! For the past five years, Wall Streeters have been speculating—eagerly, but mostly in vain—that interest rates were about to rise. GET READY FOR INFLATION AND HIGHER INTEREST RATES intoned the aptly named Dr. Arthur Laffer in a June 10, 2009 Wall Street Journal op-ed piece.
Since that date, of course, the federal funds rate (the rate banks charge each other for short-term loans) has remained stuck at zero to 0.25%. The 10-year Treasury yield has bounced somewhat from its 2012 lows, but remains one-third below where it stood when Laffer penned his article.
Still, it's a pretty sure bet that at some point, the Federal Reserve will snug up its ultra-easy monetary policy—and interest rates will pop. Let's take an educated guess at when that moment might arrive, together with the likely consequences for your bonds and other interest-sensitive investments.
Some analysts try to get a handle on the likely course of Fed policy by listening to the gobbledygook spewed by Janet Yellen and other Fed spokespersons. I prefer to watch the trading in federal funds futures contracts. (You can look up current quotes at www.cmegroup.com.) While futures traders certainly aren't omniscient, the pricing of the fed funds contracts gives you a baseline: It tells you what mainstream observers are expecting. You can disagree with the consensus, of course, but you should have good reasons for doing so.
As we speak, the futures market doesn't expect the fed funds rate to climb even to a full 0.25% (from the present zero to 0.25% range) until June 2015. The consensus is anticipating a 1% rate—very modest indeed by historical standards—in April 2016, 20 months from now.
If I saw mounting evidence that the U.S. economy was about to take off into the wild blue yonder, I would challenge the futures market's view. But I'm picking up few, if any, such signals. More likely, growth will just continue to plod along.
In that case, yields on short-term money market instruments will remain extremely low for another year at least, presenting little competition for bonds of longer maturity or lower credit quality. Investors who exit their bonds (and bond substitutes, such as preferred stocks) too soon will regret it, because their income will drop sharply.
Even after the Fed gets around to nudging rates up, the impact on longer-dated bonds may be less severe than during last year's "taper tantrum." Undoubtedly, bond prices will feel some downward pressure. (As yields rise, bond prices fall.) If, however, bond traders sense that the Fed plans to stop turning the screws before short-term money rates reach, say, 2%, prices for long-dated bonds may not fall significantly below last year's lows until 2017—or later.
So don't rush off in a panic. Instead of undertaking an "extreme makeover" on your fixed-income portfolio, I advise you to proceed cautiously and gradually as the evidence unfolds. Specifically, here's what I suggest:
Richard E. Band is the newsletter world's #1 authority on investing for low-risk growth. His flagship Total Return Portfolio has grown sixfold since its inception in 1990, while taking far less risk than the popular stock market index funds. More »
My greatest successes with Profitable Investing have been CVX, SLB, SO, RPM, HOG, HSY, Applebees, and Yankee Candle Co.; the key was staying diversified and never panicking. Recovery from 2000 and 2008 were relatively prompt.I retired in '91 at age 55 with a $500K IRA and $500K in savings. Lived off retirement checks of $30k and savings for 5 years, then commenced IRA withdrawal's starting at $40K a year, increasing to $80K now, and savings is still at $500k and IRA at $1.6 million. Presently operating with a $130k budget and IRA still increasing. Maintained 50%-60% stocks evenly divided between growth and value and other half in a preferred ladder and various bond funds. Used both your letter and Richard Young's Intelligence Report. Both did their job about equally effective with a slightly different approach, yet very similar.
–D.J.A., San Jose, CA